Key Issues and Opportunities in Transfer Pricing

Key Issues and Opportunities in Transfer Pricing

Transfer pricing is an important global issue for companies. It applies to transactions between related companies in different countries. These related companies can be part of the same group or connected through direct or indirect control, influencing each other’s management or board of directors. This article will overview of the key issues and opportunities in Transfer Pricing.

Understanding Transfer Pricing

Transfer pricing refers to the prices for goods or services traded between related entities. These prices must follow the arm’s length principle, which means they should be the same as the prices that would be charged between completely independent companies in similar situations.

What are the Key Issues in TP

Implementing Transfer Pricing policies is complex for businesses of all sizes. Operational Transfer Pricing, which deals with applying TP rules in practice, requires coordination across data, systems, people, and technology. Many companies still struggle, with nearly 70% of tax leaders saying there’s room for improvement. Poor implementation can lead to financial losses, tax penalties, and wasted time.

The main challenges include unreliable data, which means that the information is often inconsistent or hard to access, which affects accuracy and compliance. Another issue is manual processes, as many tasks are done manually, increasing the risk of errors and inefficiency. Furthermore, without clear governance and oversight, mistakes and risks increase. Additionally, many companies still rely on Excel, which limits automation and control. Choosing the right tools helps streamline and support the transfer pricing-related calculations. Solving these issues requires better data management, clear documentation, strong controls, and the right technology.

Assessing the Risks in TP

It’s important for businesses to understand and manage transfer pricing risks so that they can avoid compliance issues. As tax rules change and authorities are working closely together, it is possible that as a result of transfer pricing audits, a company can be subject to fines or reputational damage, if these risks are not handled well.

Some of the transfer pricing-related risks include:

  1. Non-compliance Penalties – Incomplete or outdated documentation (missing local/master files) can lead to tax, interest, penalties, and reputational damage.
  2. Audit Risk – Global cooperation between tax authorities and increased use of technology raises the risk of investigations.
  3. Reputational Risk – Transfer pricing data may be shared across countries or made public, leading to commercial or brand damage.
  4. Incorrect Pricing of Related Party Transactions – Not applying the arm’s-length principle can result in tax adjustments or double taxation.
  5. New Global Tax Rules (BEPS) – Changing requirements (master/local files, and country-by-country reporting) increases compliance burden and risk of errors.

Challenges in Transfer Pricing

The implementation of the transfer pricing policies is followed by many challenges for both businesses and tax authorities. Tax regulations are constantly subject to changes, particularly related to the documentation standards —such as the OECD’s three-tiered approach requiring a Master File, Local File, and Country-by-Country Report. As a result, the businesses are likely to be asked to provide strong evidence that the intercompany transactions are within the arm’s length principle. While this may be possible for large multinationals with in-house specialist tax functions, the task may be burdensome for small businesses or those with relatively simple transactions, for whom the time and expense incurred may be prohibitive.

 One major challenge is the high cost of preparing detailed transfer pricing documentation. Smaller businesses lack the resources, while larger ones put a lot of effort into finding a balance between giving enough detail for tax authorities and avoiding unnecessary work.

Another common difficulty is the mismatch between the expectations of tax authorities and the operational goals of businesses. While authorities often seek detailed and comprehensive information to assess compliance risks, businesses aim to reduce compliance burdens while still meeting the rules.

On the other hand, practical issues such as language barriers and the decentralized nature of documentation add to the difficulties. Relevant documents may be maintained in different languages or stored in foreign subsidiaries, making it difficult to gather and present consistent, accessible information during an audit or inquiry.

How to Mitigate Risks in Transfer Pricing Policies?

This section is relevant for in-house tax teams and external transfer pricing specialists who are responsible for the review and conduct of transfer pricing policies. Risks, and how they may be reduced, must be understood since unsupported policies will eventually result in compliance issues and adjustments that will cost the business. To identify potential risks effectively, key areas need to be considered, such as the contractual terms, activities performed, assets employed, and risks assumed by the two parties, the nature of goods or services exchanged, the overall market and economic conditions, and the business objectives of the two parties involved.

Opportunities in Transfer Pricing

Transfer pricing isn’t just about compliance; it offers real business benefits. When done strategically, it can:

  1. Reduce global tax rates
  2. Improve cash flow
  3. Minimize audit risks and penalties
  4. Support consistent profits across subsidiaries
  5. Allow for adjustments based on market conditions
  6. Help avoid audits with strong documentation
  7. Make use of past reports to save on costs

By managing transfer pricing proactively, companies can gain financial and operational advantages.

Our firm provides our clients with comprehensive assistance with their transfer pricing needs globally. To contact a team member, please click here.

F Q A

It depends. Some countries ask for the local file preparation if there are transactions, no matter the value of them, some ask only if the transaction or entity exceeds a set threshold. To understand if you need to have a local file documentation, you need to consider a few main aspects:

  • Are there transactions between the entity and a related entity in a different jurisdiction?
  • The local regulations in the country where the entity is located.
  • The type and value of the transaction.
  • The finances of the group.

Global minimum tax is an OECD initiative introduced as a part of the BEPS program. The idea behind this initiative is to ensure that big multinational corporations are taxed at an effective tax rate of at least 15%. Most countries added this initiative to their local legislation. The entry into force date varies among the countries, for example, the EU has implemented the regulation from January 2024.  

Amount B is a part of Pillar One from the OECD BEPS program. The purpose of Amount B is to act as a safe harbor for baseline marketing and distribution services.

Currently, the future of Amount B isn’t clear. As its implementation is optional,  some countries including Germany and the Netherlands, already announced that they aren’t going to implement it.