Transfer Pricing Regulations in Bolivia

Transfer Pricing Regulations Bolivia

Bolivia’s transfer pricing (TP) laws align with the Guidelines set by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD Guidelines); however, it has not implemented the OECD’s BEPS Action 13 Regulations regarding transfer pricing. Currently, the TP regulations are incorporated into Law No. 549, July 23, 2014.

Arm’s Length Principle

When related companies do business with each other, the prices for their transactions should be the same as if they were independent companies. This means that the price should match what would be agreed upon in the open market between two unrelated businesses.

Related Party Definition

Related parties are defined as those in which there is direct or indirect participation in management, control, or capital, or when a third party participates directly or indirectly in the management, control, or capital of two or more enterprises. Additionally, if a Bolivian company does business with entities in tax havens, those transactions may automatically be treated as related-party dealings, even if there’s no formal connection between the parties.

Transfer Pricing Methods

The methods that can be used to determine the arm’s length price in Bolivia are:

  • Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method
  • Resale Price Method
  • Cost Plus Method
  • Transactional Net Margin Method
  • Profit Split Method

 

In addition to the five methods by the OECD, Bolivia also uses the Evident Price on the Transparent Markets method – adopted from the Argentinian law. The selection of the method used is based on the most appropriate method rule and takes into consideration factors such as the nature and economic reality of each transaction.

Comparability Analysis

A comparability analysis must be conducted to select the appropriate method and to demonstrate that transactions are at arm’s length. Factors considered include contractual terms, the characteristics of goods or services, economic circumstances, the functions performed, the assets used, and the risks assumed.

Bolivia’s legislation allows for the usage of both, domestic and foreign comparables to determine the arm’s length principle.

Documentation Requirements

As Bolivia has not implemented the BEPS Action 13 Regulations, domestic legislation is not based on the OECD three-layer documentation comprised of Master, Local files, and CbC reporting. Based on Supreme Decree No. 2227 taxpayers in Bolivia must prepare a transfer pricing study for certain transactions between related companies. This study must be available for both the tax and customs authorities.

The study should include:

  1. The name of the taxpayer and the related companies involved
  2. A description of what each company does
  3. Details of the transaction, including the amounts involved
  4. The tax residence (country) of each related company
  5. The business reasons and strategy behind the prices used
  6. A description of the taxpayer’s role and activities in the transaction

 

Documentation must be submitted only in the Spanish language, and submitted to the tax authorities within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year. Documentation must be prepared in both hard copy and digital formats; while the hard copy is submitted to the taxpayer’s offices, the electronic version is submitted to their webpage.

Advance Pricing Agreements (APA) and Mutual Agreement Program (MAP)

 Bolivia does not offer advance pricing agreements or advance tax rulings.

Approach to Transfer Pricing Audits

Tax authorities may request transfer pricing documentation from taxpayers and initiate a transfer pricing audit. The audit process can include a review of related-party transactions, and adjustments can be made if prices are not in accordance with the arm’s length principle.

Penalties

Failure to comply with transfer pricing documentation requirements may result in adjustments to taxable income and penalties. Penalties may include fines and interest on unpaid taxes. For instance, if a company fails to submit its transfer pricing information or tax return (Form 601), it can be fined up to USD 1,684. If the information is submitted late or incomplete, the fine is USD 842.

Repeated non-compliance may lead to additional sanctions. As such, if a company files an incorrect or too-low tax return and doesn’t notify the authorities, it may be treated as a tax crime, which can lead to fines or imprisonment for 3 to 6 years.

Taxation at a Glance

In Bolivia, both companies and individuals pay taxes under the Income Tax Law (ITL). This law sets a flat tax rate on income from business activities. Taxes on income (for both people and businesses) are only collected by the national government, not by local or regional authorities. Corporate taxation is based on the territorial tax system, and businesses are taxed only on their income from Bolivian sources.

The currency of Bolivia is the Bolivian Peso.

The official name of the Bolivia tax authority is the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

The table below provides a summary of the main taxation rates related to businesses:

Tax Type

Tax Rate

Corporate Tax

25%

VAT

13%

Withholding tax on dividends to non-residents

12.5%

Withholding tax on interest to non-residents

12.5%

Withholding tax on royalties to non-residents

12.5%

Our firm provides our clients with comprehensive assistance in their transfer pricing needs globally. To contact a team member, please click here.

F Q A

It depends. Some countries ask for the local file preparation if there are transactions, no matter the value of them, some ask only if the transaction or entity exceeds a set threshold. To understand if you need to have a local file documentation, you need to consider a few main aspects:

  • Are there transactions between the entity and a related entity in a different jurisdiction?
  • The local regulations in the country where the entity is located.
  • The type and value of the transaction.
  • The finances of the group.

Global minimum tax is an OECD initiative introduced as a part of the BEPS program. The idea behind this initiative is to ensure that big multinational corporations are taxed at an effective tax rate of at least 15%. Most countries added this initiative to their local legislation. The entry into force date varies among the countries, for example, the EU has implemented the regulation from January 2024.  

Amount B is a part of Pillar One from the OECD BEPS program. The purpose of Amount B is to act as a safe harbor for baseline marketing and distribution services.

Currently, the future of Amount B isn’t clear. As its implementation is optional,  some countries including Germany and the Netherlands, already announced that they aren’t going to implement it.